Skip to content

Robert Lewis Dabney: “a party which never conserves anything”

19 July 2021

.

“This is a party [established conservativism] which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is to-day one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will to-morrow be forced upon its timidity, and will be succeeded by some third revolution, to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt hath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it he salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious, for the sake of the truth, and has no idea of being guilty of the folly of martyrdom. It always—when about to enter a protest—very blandly informs the wild beast whose path it essays to stop, that its ‘bark is worse than its bite,’ and that it only means to save its manners by enacting its decent rôle of resistance. The only practical purpose which it now subserves in American politics is to give enough exercise to Radicalism to keep it ‘in wind,’ and to prevent its becoming pursy and lazy from having nothing to whip.”

Robert Lewis Dabney, 1871

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

3 Comments leave one →
  1. ctmiller8492 permalink
    19 July 2021 9:20 am

    You do not owe the American ruling class anything but contempt. You should hate them because they hate you.

  2. Noah permalink
    2 February 2022 3:35 pm

    Hello,
    Was wondering where this quote was taken from.
    Thank you.
    Sincerely,
    Noah

    • 2 February 2022 4:59 pm

      It is from an article titled, “Women’s Rights Women,” in The Southern Magazine, 1871.

Leave a comment