Skip to content

Alasdair MacIntyre: “the coming ages of barbarism and darkness”

16 April 2015

alasdair_maclntyre ” “It is always dangerous to draw too precise parallels between one historical period and another; and among the most misleading of such parallels are those which have been drawn between our own age in Europe and North America and the epoch in which the Roman empire declined into the Dark Ages. Nonetheless certain parallels there are. A crucial turning point in that earlier history occurred when men and women of good will turned aside from the task of shoring up the Roman imperium and ceased to identify the continuation of civility and moral community with the maintenance of that imperium. What they set themselves to achieve instead — often not recognizing fully what they were doing — was the construction of new forms of community within which the moral life could be sustained so that both morality and civility might survive the coming ages of barbarism and darkness. If my account of our moral condition is correct, we ought also to conclude that for some time now we too have reached that turning point. What matters at this stage is the construction of local forms of community within which civility and the intellectual and moral life can be sustained through the new dark ages which are already upon us. And if the tradition of the virtues was able to survive the horrors of the last dark ages, we are not entirely without grounds for hope. This time however the barbarians are not waiting beyond the frontiers; they have been governing us for quite some time. And it is our lack of consciousness of this that constitutes part of our predicament. We are waiting not for a Godot, but for another — doubtless very different — St. Benedict. “

– Alasdair MacIntyre, in his book After Virtue

One Comment leave one →
  1. 16 April 2015 4:00 pm

    Reblogged this on Truth and Tolerance and commented:
    This 30 year old quote by Alasdair MacIntyre has been making the internet rounds lately: at what point do contemporary Christians do what they did in the fading days of the Roman Empire and the Dark Ages, deciding that the standing political order no longer represented their community, that it was no longer salvageable.
    Christian attitudes towards the Empire were always ambivalent: Rome was both Babylon and the protector of order. You can replace “Rome” with “Christendom” or “America”, different names, same reality.
    The irony is that St. Benedict gave up on Roman order and started a monastic movement that actually preserved much of the best of Roman civilization. The classically Roman sense of balance, moderation, order, and work is a deep part of the Benedictine spirit. We also owe to the monks the preservation of whatever Latin literature we still posses.
    I still think the current order has some life in it, but it is fading. What should we salvage? What is worth preserving? How do we accomplish it? Amish or Orthodox style ghettos? Is that what we want?
    What might the new Benedict look like? We need him.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: